Re: slave to master
Reindl Harald <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.mysql.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | the lounge interactive design |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 29.04.2016 um 22:22 schrieb Mahmoud Alshinhab: > I was think of it from the cloud prospective, as for example you can > guarantee that Amazon's Elastic Load Balancer won't be a single point of > failure, so I was thinking how can I use MariaDB MaxScale and in the > same time guarantee that it won't be a single point of failure. why should max scale care *what* your mysql-client is? anything which can talk to your mysql server will talk the same way to max scale, it acts like a ordinary mysql server from the view of any client > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Reindl Harald <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Am 29.04.2016 um 17:27 schrieb Mahmoud Alshinhab: > > I also like the MariaDB Max scale that Reindl Harald Sent -Thanks- > However I don't know if it is possible to use 2 servers of the > max scale > with a load balancer in front of them or not. > I always try to avoid the Single Point of Failure > > > get rid of the idea that your "load-balancer" not a single point > > in a sane environment there is no single point of failure because > max scale *is the load balancer* and typically runs on a HA cluster > where it never goes away (virtual machine on a cluster FS - as > example - VMware vSphere with two hosts and VMware HA enabled) > > why do you want a load balancer in front of a load balancer and how > do you make sure that this load balancer is redundant and not a > single point of failure itself? > > "https://mariadb.com/products/mariadb-maxscale/how-maxscale-works" > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Mahmoud Alshinhab > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > I quote this from the page[1]: > > > Load balancing implementation > > > Random picking > > When initializing a connection or after a failed connection, the > connector will attempt to connect to a host with a certain role > (slave/master). The connection is selected randomly among > the valid > hosts. Thereafter, all statements will run on that database > server > until the connection will be closed (or fails). > > The load-balancing will includes a pooling mechanism. > Example: when > creating a pool of 60 connections, each one will use a > random host. > With 3 master hosts, the pool will have about 20 connections > to each > host. > > > Master/slave distributed load > > For a cluster composed of masters and slaves on connection > initialization, there will be 2 underlying connections: one > with a > master host, another with a slave host. Only one connection > is used > at a time. > For a cluster composed of master hosts only, each connection has > only one underlying connection. > The load will be distributed due to the random distribution of > connections.. > > > Master/slave connection selection > > It’s the application that has to decide to use master or slave > connection (the master connection is set by default). > Switching the type of connection is done by using JDBC > connection.setReadOnly(boolean readOnly) > > <http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/sql/Connection.html#setReadOnly%28boolean%29> > method. Setting read-only to true will use the slave connection, > false, the master connection. > > [1] > > https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/failover-and-high-availability-with-mariadb-connector-j/ > > So I think it is not implemented yet. as "the application has to > decide to use master or slave connection (the master > connection is > set by default)." > > -- > Eng. Mahmoud Alshinhab > AWS Cloud Support Engineer > Fedora Ambassador > Wiki : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tuxawy > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Mahmoud Alshinhab > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>> > wrote: > > It was actually built for Amazon's Aurora, but it should > work > with any mysql-compatible protoco. > > -- > Eng. Mahmoud Alshinhab > AWS Cloud Support Engineer > Fedora Ambassador > Wiki : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tuxawy > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Reindl Harald > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> > wrote: > > > Am 29.04.2016 um 15:07 schrieb Johan De Meersman: > > From: "Mahmoud Alshinhab" > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>> > Subject: Re: slave to master > > > I think you should have a look at MariaDB > Connector[1]. > > > It provides Load balancing and failover as > Failover > occurs when a connection to > a primary database server fails and the > connector > will open up a connection to > another database server. > > > Hmm, I didn't know that they built that into it, > interesting. Does it require server features, or > would > it work with any mysql-compatible protocol ? > > Load balancing allows load (read and write) > to be > distributed over multiple > servers. > > > Is read-write splitting also built-in, then? > > > here you go: > https://mariadb.com/de/products/mariadb-maxscale and > forget > about "MariaDB Connector" whatever that is >
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 181 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlckHNsACgkQhmBjz394Anlk7QCfW9UkgsL4ezHsd7QXbjfjzzaZ Rd8AnAg/++DmDGA3ogbZm40aeVb+HEnu =j8dJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----