Re: WorkBench 5.2 RC
Brandon Whitehead <[email protected]> Wed, 26 May 2010 08:49:42 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.mysql.mycc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mike and the rest of the team, I would like to mirror Charlie's sentiments almost exactly. I even went = as far as using WB 5.1 as one of the classroom tool for the recent = database class I taught at UW (the next alternative for the $$ is Visio, = gak!). Despite a few bugs and quirks (which seem to be mostly gone in = 5.2), most of the students, who were completely new to databases, were = impressed with the general usability and learning curve of the = application, which I feel speaks measures to the quality of the product. I've been using the GUI tools for years (despite frequent crashing on = Macs) and I'm very happy that WB is finally to the point that I can = leave the old tools behind (now that I've finally figured out how to = make quick schema changes). Thanks for the great work! This product has a great opportunity to be a = game changer, especially for those who are new to SQL and don't write it = with a text editor, those who want modeling tools, and those who are = trying to push MySQL (and OSS) in the enterprise.=20 Brandon +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Brandon K. Whitehead Director, Academic Personnel Information Services University of Washington +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ On May 26, 2010, at 3:09 AM, Charlie Farrow wrote: > Initially when MySQL decided to focus their attentions onto workbench, = I have to say I was a little peeved. The whole thing seemed to be a bit = of a mish-mash and the initial versions (if you could even get them to = run) were unstable and seemed like a lot of work had gone into pointless = features. >=20 > The old GUI tools individually I found very useful and I contributed a = great deal to bug reports on them and helped where possible to suggest = improvements, so naturally this position of feeling all this work had = somewhat gone to waste, especially when it seemed the replacement was = inferior. (I do seem to recall moaning as such on the lists at some = point!) >=20 > However, I have used a couple of previous versions of workbench in the = 5.1 and 5.2 series and progress has been extremely good. I am now using = it for most of the things I used to do with Administrator and Query = Browser and its functional, stable and surpasses the original programs = in some ways, which if development continues will be all ways. >=20 > I'd therefore very publicaly like to congratulate the whole workbench = team on an excellent job well done and look forward to more feature in = the future! >=20 > Charlie >=20 -- MySQL GUI Tools Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/gui-tools To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[email protected]