Re: WorkBench 5.2 RC

Brandon Whitehead <[email protected]> Wed, 26 May 2010 08:49:42 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.mysql.mycc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Mike and the rest of the team,

I would like to mirror Charlie's sentiments almost exactly.  I even went =
as far as using WB 5.1 as one of the classroom tool for the recent =
database class I taught at UW (the next alternative for the $$ is Visio, =
gak!). Despite a few bugs and quirks (which seem to be mostly gone in =
5.2), most of the students, who were completely new to databases, were =
impressed with the general usability and learning curve of the =
application, which I feel speaks measures to the quality of the product.

I've been using the GUI tools for years (despite frequent crashing on =
Macs) and I'm very happy that WB is finally to the point that I can =
leave the old tools behind (now that I've finally figured out how to =
make quick schema changes).

Thanks for the great work!  This product has a great opportunity to be a =
game changer, especially for those who are new to SQL and don't write it =
with a text editor, those who want modeling tools, and those who are =
trying to push MySQL (and OSS) in the enterprise.=20

Brandon
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 Brandon K. Whitehead
 Director, Academic Personnel Information Services
 University of Washington
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

On May 26, 2010, at 3:09 AM, Charlie Farrow wrote:

> Initially when MySQL decided to focus their attentions onto workbench, =
I have to say I was a little peeved. The whole thing seemed to be a bit =
of a mish-mash and the initial versions (if you could even get them to =
run) were unstable and seemed like a lot of work had gone into pointless =
features.
>=20
> The old GUI tools individually I found very useful and I contributed a =
great deal to bug reports on them and helped where possible to suggest =
improvements, so naturally this position of feeling all this work had =
somewhat gone to waste, especially when it seemed the replacement was =
inferior. (I do seem to recall moaning as such on the lists at some =
point!)
>=20
> However, I have used a couple of previous versions of workbench in the =
5.1 and 5.2 series and progress has been extremely good. I am now using =
it for most of the things I used to do with Administrator and Query =
Browser and its functional, stable and surpasses the original programs =
in some ways, which if development continues will be all ways.
>=20
> I'd therefore very publicaly like to congratulate the whole workbench =
team on an excellent job well done and look forward to more feature in =
the future!
>=20
> Charlie
>=20


-- 
MySQL GUI Tools Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/gui-tools
To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/[email protected]