Re: update query returns wrong number of rows affected

Dave Dyer wrote:

> The case in point, I'm merging two databases and all the
> rows are usually the same.  I'm interested in the exceptions;
> and to me "affected rows" means changed rows.  
> 
> Maybe it's always been this way, but the C api makes the number
> of changed rows easily available, I find it very useful.

But you can answer that question by performing a simple count query?


-- 
http://lilypie.com/baby1/050423/1/5/1/+1

-- 
MySQL Perl Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/perl
To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/[email protected]