Re: Windows of Linux
Armando <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.mysql.windows |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Not to start a "which is the best distro" discussion, but you should really make the choice based on the importance of the system. I'd personally choose a reputable and respectable organization which can provide you service and support of the distro you install. If it's more of a personal choice, well hell go with whatever you see fit, but as everyone else says, it's all in the configuration. That's where a supportive vendor makes the difference.. they can assist you with ensuring it's done right. Cheers. Armando Jangita wrote: > Ok im sold to linux > > debian? > > Daniel da Veiga wrote: > >> On 5/11/06, Petr Vileta <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Jangita" <[email protected]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 2:10 PM >>> Subject: Windows of Linux >>> >>> >>> > Hello all, >>> > >>> > Im about to start a service that will be doing about 50 >>> transactions a day >>> > so will grow to quite a large size. >>> > >>> > i was wondering without considering network security, which backend >>> would >>> > be the best? windows or linux - we have 500 different clients who >>> *might* >>> > all connect at the same time, in addition to the sheer size the >>> database >>> > will grow to... >>> > >>> I'm Windows user but for production mysql server I recommend Linux. >>> It is >>> more stable then Windows and require cheaper hardware for the same >>> computing >>> power. And last but not least - Linux do not know what is the virus :-) >>> >>> Petr Vileta, Czech republic >> >> >> I agree with Petr, Windows is not so bad (I'm a Linux user and a >> Windows gamer) but can't be considered (and I tried all versions) >> stable enough for a production environment (IMHO, please no flames as >> I'm not saying this because I hate Microsoft or anything, its just MY >> SINGLE experience in many computing labs). >> >> I have a Pentium 100 with 48MB of RAM running Linux and mirroring a >> production server with 5 giant databases and thousands of daily >> queries. Can Windows do that? >> >> Anyway, MySQL is so portable that for many years I developed and >> tested applications at Windows and then ported it with NO EFFORT at >> all to my production Linux server, and even have run a Windows server >> for a few months, MySQL is pretty stable and any problems should come >> from the OS, so, stick with what you think is more stable and less >> likely to error out. >> > -- MySQL Windows Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/win32 To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[email protected]