Re: SQL workflow for crash testing correctness
Joseph Hammerman <[email protected]> Wed, 18 Sep 2019 18:49:04 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.admin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFZjsjD+MmLKy_3Arw1F7ECF4mTi3fSMbEJd7M2zT8Eq10KwgA@mail.gmail.com> |
Thanks Jeff! On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 2:39 PM Jeff Janes <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 9:27 PM Joseph Hammerman < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Good evening PGSQL admin email distribution list, >> >> I have built an HA cluster setup. I would like to instrument a workflow >> to test for lost or duplicated writes. >> >> Does anyone know of prior art that does this? >> >> > I have a testing framework which injects faults under high load, and then > tests to see that automatic recovery happens correctly. I have used it to > find several bugs, but haven't turned up any in the last couple releases > (likely because improved regression tests are now catching them before I > get a chance to). I've always just tested this as crash recovery within a > single instance, but I think there is no reason the technique couldn't be > used for multiple instances is well. You can search for my name and " > count.pl" on the hackers list to find multiple example of the testing > harness. The nature of the fault injected (torn page writes) is just a > function of what I was working on at the time I wrote it, most of the bugs > uncovered had nothing to do with the exact thing which caused the crash. > > > >> Does anyone have thoughts on how to model this? My initial thoughts were >> to find the serialization tests in the Postgres project core. >> > > Looking at the core regression tests may also be a good idea. Of course > then you would have to ponder, if you test the same way as they do, will > you find different bugs from what they find? So I would view it more as > inspiration than as instructions. > > Cheers, > > Jeff > >>