Re: Pg_upgrade error could not load library from 7.14/8.4 to 10.10 version

On 20/9/19 10:05 π.μ., Ekaterina Amez wrote:
>
>
> El 19/9/19 a las 15:57, Tom Lane escribió:
>> Ekaterina Amez<[email protected]>  writes:
>>> El 19/9/19 a las 10:07, Achilleas Mantzios escribió:
>>>> On 19/9/19 10:49 π.μ., Ekaterina Amez wrote:
>>>>> 2019-09-19 08:53:50.345 CEST [2283] postgres@template1 ERROR:  could not load library "/usr/lib/postgresql/8.4/lib/plpgsql.so": /usr/lib/postgresql/8.4/lib/plpgsql.so: undefined symbol: SPI_push
>> This error is clearly due to trying to load the 8.4 version of plpgsql.so
>> into the v10 server.
>
> Before posting here, my investigation lead me to think this was the problem as every post I found with similar errors were all related to newer PG trying to use old libs. But didn't know what/how to 
> search for this (nor how to resolve). After your comment I suppose it can be seen in the last block of pg_upgrade_server.log:
>
> 2019-09-19 08:53:50.345 CEST [2283] postgres@template1 ERROR:  could not load library "/usr/lib/postgresql/8.4/lib/plpgsql.so": /usr/lib/postgresql/8.4/lib/plpgsql.so: undefined symbol: SPI_push
> 2019-09-19 08:53:50.345 CEST [2283] postgres@template1 STATEMENT:  LOAD '/usr/lib/postgresql/8.4/lib/plpgsql.so'
> command: "/usr/lib/postgresql/10/bin/pg_ctl" -w -D "/var/lib/postgresql/10/main" -o "-c config_file=/etc/postgresql/10/main/postgresql.conf" -m fast stop >> "pg_upgrade_server.log" 2>&1
> 2019-09-19 08:53:50.354 CEST [2272] LOG:  received fast shutdown request
> waiting for server to shut down....2019-09-19 08:53:50.358 CEST [2272] LOG:  aborting any active transactions
> 2019-09-19 08:53:50.363 CEST [2272] LOG:  worker process: logical replication launcher (PID 2278) exited with exit code 1
> 2019-09-19 08:53:50.364 CEST [2274] LOG:  shutting down
> 2019-09-19 08:53:50.377 CEST [2272] LOG:  database system is shut down
>   done
> server stopped
>
> It's running command
>
> 	 "/usr/lib/postgresql/10/bin/pg_ctl"
>
> When complains with
>
> 	could not load library "/usr/lib/postgresql/8.4/lib/plpgsql.so"
>
> Right?
>
>> What seems like the likely cause is that the
>> pg_proc.probin entries for the plpgsql support functions were literally
>> "/usr/lib/postgresql/8.4/lib/plpgsql.so", rather than something that
>> would adapt to the new version.  The preferred way to declare such
>> functions, for a long time, has been with probin = "$libdir/plpgsql",
>> relying on the server to subsitute an appropriate path for $libdir.
>
> I've looked in pg_proc catalog and plpgsql_call_handler is declared with probin = "$libdir/plpgsql" (only in PG10). Is the substitution of $libdir what's wrong? Don't know how to look for this (I've 
> been working with Linux/Postgres for 3 months only, so still limited ability/knowledge)
>
Just tested in my 11 and 10 :
dynacom=# select proname,probin,pronamespace from pg_proc where proname='plpgsql_call_handler';
        proname        |             probin              | pronamespace
----------------------+---------------------------------+--------------
  plpgsql_call_handler | $libdir/plpgsql                 | 11
  plpgsql_call_handler | /usr/local/pgsql/lib/plpgsql.so | 2200
(2 rows)

with 2200 being the public namespace/schema.

I my case, in every postgresql installation since 2001, always libdir was /usr/local/pgsql/lib/ , so maybe this problem could not be manifested. Did you check to see if you have the 
plpgsql_call_handler defined in two schemas as well?

>
>>> With these results, finally I've:
>>>       1- modified template1 in PG 8.4 server to include plpgsql language,
>>> so it can be inherited in new databases created from this template.
>>>       2- Dropped and recreated my database (let's call it newdb).
>> This probably fixed it by ensuring that the plpgsql support functions
>> were declared with the standard value of probin.
>>
>>> The conclusion is that I can avoid the use of plpgsql.so library. My
>>> question now would be related about the creation of the language in
>>> version 8.4: is it better to create it at template level or at database
>>> level?
>> I would not sweat too much about this, since you don't intend to keep
>> using 8.4 (or at least I hope not).
> That's what I'm trying: convince people to upgrade our servers.
>>   Since 9.0, plpgsql is automatically
>> installed at initdb time and there's no need for an additional copy.
> Yeah, I know that, but since I can't assure that we are going to upgrade (at least inmediatly) to PG > 9.0 I'd like to know if there's anything that I should take in consideration  when creating 
> language in 8.4, in order to create it at template level or at database level only.
>> 			regards, tom lane
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ekaterina
>


-- 
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEV Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt