Re: Uber moving towards MySQL
"Joshua D. Drake" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Organization | Command Prompt, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 07/26/2016 02:57 PM, Santiago Zarate wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> Has anyone read the following article?, i'm personlally inclined to
> think that some of these problems could have been addressed with enough
> expertise.
It is being discussed on -hackers and -general right now.
>
> At our company we may move to PostgreSQL for one of our core products
> (we use oracle), and a colleague came with this today. While this
> started a very heated discussion on our side... I wonder, what do you
> guys think
I think they have some valid points, especially around:
Inefficient data replication
Poor replica MVCC support
Difficulty upgrading to newer releases
Whilst Berkus brought up:
Inefficient architecture for writes
They are all good points but Oracle certainly has its own list too.
Sincerely,
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.
--
Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy