Re: How can we get the word out about the change in version numbering?
Darren Duncan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2016-08-18 7:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 8/15/16 7:21 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: >> This means that we have a year to make sure that every driver author and >> every body who has some hackish script parsing the version number scheme >> finds out about it -- before 10.0 is released. > > Realistically, most stuff doesn't even support 9.6 yet, and we wouldn't > want to distract from that. So my take is to do nothing for about the > next 6 months. So, per my initial response, a good and easy strategy would be a one-two punch of mentioning both 9.6 and 10.0 in the same announcements. The announcements would headline with and be focused on 9.6, but each would include a footnote about 10.0 also. That way people are reminded of the 10.0 need without being hit over the head by having dedicated announcements about it. -- Darren Duncan -- Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy