Re: How can we get the word out about the change in version numbering?

On 8/19/16 1:44 AM, Darren Duncan wrote:
>> Realistically, most stuff doesn't even support 9.6 yet, and we wouldn't
>> want to distract from that.  So my take is to do nothing for about the
>> next 6 months.
> 
> So, per my initial response, a good and easy strategy would be a one-two punch 
> of mentioning both 9.6 and 10.0 in the same announcements.  The announcements 
> would headline with and be focused on 9.6, but each would include a footnote 
> about 10.0 also.  That way people are reminded of the 10.0 need without being 
> hit over the head by having dedicated announcements about it. -- Darren Duncan

My argument is that we should exactly not do that.

The point of announcements about release 9.6 is to get people to test or
use release 9.6.  Mentioning a distant future release does not further
that aim.

Furthermore, a note about version 10 is not really actionable right now.
 No author of a driver or extension or application is realistically
going to download 10devel now and port their code and then tuck it away
for another 8 months.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy