Re: DRAFT 9.6 release
Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAB7nPqTFZH=13d+t8rx4e33PRAFofMM4eKZfPAaePQkU5ucwuw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Josh Berkus <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/30/2016 06:39 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Josh Berkus <[email protected]> wrote: >>> ??? It's always been possible for me to give multiple standbys the same >>> name, making a de-facto group. >> >> A "group" grammar, by that I mean an alias referring to a set of >> nodes, is not supported. And you can still define multiple entries >> with the same name. >> > > Yeah, so what happens in the case I described? Is the master just > looking for that number of commits, or is it looking for a commit from > g1 and from g2? How do you set up synchronous_standby_names in this case? Are multiple nodes using the same application_name, being either 'g1' or 'g2'? -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy