Re: PG "Users" page?
Justin Clift <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11 Sep 2016, at 17:14, Dave Page <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 11 Sep 2016, at 16:55, Justin Clift <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi us, >> >> Just noticed that our Featured Users page has “Sun Microsystems” listed: >> >> https://www.postgresql.org/about/users/ >> (Under “Technology” at the bottom) >> >> Should we update that to say “Oracle” :D … or maybe just nuke that entry? > > That page is completely unmaintained. I proposed removing it a couple of years back, but was met with strong objections coupled with a complete lack of volunteers to actually do the work to keep it up to date. > > I strongly feel it should be removed still - it is probably responsible for 25% of emails to webmaster@ from random companies requesting inclusion. Do they seem like legit requests, or more like companies not really using PG? If it seems like the 2nd, maybe we could have a policy like this? “We’re happy to include any company here who actively helps out on our mailing lists, and describes in detail their PostgreSQL usage on their website.” That’s coming from a “lets set a high bar to meet” perspective, which might help weed out nuisance requests. :) Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift -- "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi -- Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy