Re: When should be advocate external projects?
"Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F638B32@G01JPEXMBYT05> |
From: Tsunakawa, Takayuki/ > I've created a wiki page to list software interoperable with PostgreSQL. > > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Ecosystem:PostgreSQL_ecosystem > > I'd like to hear opinions on the items and appearance. For a sample entry, > click "Data integration" under "Software exclusively for PostgreSQL" > section. Advice on refinement of English expression is also appreciated, > as I'm not fluent in English. > > The page is presently almost empty. After soliciting the opinions on the > page, I'll start adding software entries. I identified about 280 products > that is or is likely to be interoperable with PostgreSQL, and publicize > the wiki page on pgsql-advocacy and Planet PostgreSQL. Then, I'll try > actually running the software with the latest PostgreSQL (now 9.5). > > I could not figure out a clever idea on how to keep the information fresh > effectively. But I'll give it a try by becoming the work bee... Status update. I listed about 280 software products that are likely to interoperate with PostgreSQL. I verified 8 products by running their regression tests (Distributed cache, ORM for Java), and added information for 4 products without running the software (Mail). I'll continue to verify other software and fill in the entries. Then I'd like to make other 500 products to interoperate with PostgreSQL. But I don't know how long this will take... I want to solicit for cooperation. I'm going to ask for help here in Japan. RegardsT Takayuki Tsunakawa -- Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy