Re: Has anyone seen this marketing gimmick? EnterpriseDB vs MySQL vs MariaDB
Umair Shahid <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAM184AfOmF9ei6AeUiG4wSKOVBf6N=AGc3WDt9DMrnfQL6bthg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09/25/2017 06:03 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote: > >> From: [email protected] >> >> What might be interesting to discuss here is what more we can be doing to >>> make it clear that the PostgreSQL project is independent of any single >>> company and instead has contributions from many, not unlike the Linux >>> Foundation or the Python Foundation. >>> >> >> As a user, what reminds me of a single company is the Windows >> distribution. The PG package for Windows is provided by EDB, which I think >> may give an impression that PostgreSQL is a single-vendor open source >> project. Please don't get me wrong, I'm grateful to EDB for providing an >> easy-to-use package. >> > > Just FYI, there is also the BigSQL package which is also linked from .Org. > ... and there is also the 2UDA package, also linked from .org > > Thanks, > > JD > > >> Regards >> Takayuki Tsunakawa >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc > > PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. > Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://pgconf.us > ***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. ***** > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list ([email protected]) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy >