Re: direction, was Vertica targeting PostgreSQL users

Chris Travers <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.postgresql.advocacy
Message-ID <CAKt_Zfv1zhYmiXf3aJ+BPAgyhJ96=girdtvX8DdX+QT51rqJ0Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Nov 21, 2017 01:51, "Joshua D. Drake" <[email protected]> wrote:

On 11/20/2017 04:35 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:

>
> That is a bummer for the community but the reason they
>> would do that is twofold:
>>
>> 1. Customer demand (see original post)
>> 2. Revenue generation (see original post)
>>
>> To use a term from Simon, the only "FakeNews" here is that people are
>> trying
>> to make my post into something it wasn't.
>>
> I think that you insinuated plenty.
>

I didn't, how is that unicorn ride working for you?


One thing I have learned is that the strength and the weakness of open
source is the decentralization or priorities.

It is no use arguing about it.  The community does not get to demand a
roadmap.  That has drawbacks but also advantages.



JD


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc

PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://pgconf.org
*****     Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.   *****
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.