Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY unexpectedly fails
Michael Paquier <[email protected]> Mon, 23 Dec 2019 10:59:56 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 12:45:36PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Sounds like a better wording to me. Documenting it still seems rather > important to me as I suspect that it could surprise some users. So, are there any more comments/objections about this stuff? I have plans to look at that again and wrap it at the beginning of January. -- Michael
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIyBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAl4AH5wACgkQnvQgOdby QH29vw/2Ic7QfOF5TAUi6/HQIKq2ru+bAWKJoESfik/U0/uMFuiBOS/aUAWJ3LCW JYGK4R5Jn/A9/Y2x00/HNzXg13SLmCr6jEMl0cz9dvpfzP2xJv8uRJsJirZ2XB9H OwXo/BpibV+Bgx2D1UDFRRVksXA2RltRtytnbEtYnKreolq3TqzqgvHY3ZUK/jfO hy7RSQL2Gs8wFxWe7euL96XK/MmO5Str+60TjIfogxbbUFsoW3HwnT+EY1ICsbM7 dMHWXK+WoC1gJCg9+mHyqitRoUnarHWSi2zUXkfNblu+vt4zdy4+7gVc8ZyjAVsZ g98r6faileCOIzG745PSQFczDAusWYq021yaU7pOJxC9eYJsEsfJGcbTfbB/n6GQ UFAyfP3I18an+Zy/JXxbLMZCuy9+DEe2RQxtXsEfbRoA5mrBEkcYkU8iFj3liW6g m5L5HVbNIJw/38DI+i+Y2iKakIvvopX0w4Ln3eGzHKMcT/oiZvrnzJr634N61gWZ 68pSLvdm+nEac3m3zyM2d8wA2oLEFf2Xep8PkZTjSQJsfArreRXmfnQU7WHnzlL+ YZbisR4yDNN3M167oroEOmCDwHmZdvIAYlzSsRel7kPcz8rpDPDi4oBUxXXrmxnq SKMuYr3AhdPmYRf8DU4LQKTt3rjcvrb7I42jSEu/xbwJaC4Kfw== =yNzR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----