Re: libpq parameter parsing problem
Michael Paquier <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:55:05 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 12:01:43PM +0530, Jobin Augustine wrote: > Yes, agree, readability is better with that modification. > Attaching a modified patch. (Please always top-post, this is the style of the PostgreSQL community mailing lists). The new patch looks good to me, let's see if others have extra thoughts to share. If not, I'll try to commit it. -- Michael --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAl4dgekACgkQnvQgOdby QH0+Lg/+P6R23TDR97un//3gvWkAealcmTOWUnBtjVHyakPX3bO+Sj9N3CAlgtwS A4vvdEQGw6y2+ZEQFu8t4QKVprivTLLgXAozmNPmN2RqQIRvM6uuvg2Ri2O+pT1t 67K+VwAxDL34Knk3TqTzd2mYLkZlwvJa8weZxerOj0hhsm7tVEjQOXhhxqlOZzv5 VI0bld8d1C6TX6y+uUyfmYSeRaxJ6i7Ouhsil7nLnj/HUK3RIr/WwtDpyWFPcCrF VLuy+XFY2/dY3J95F+EMl6OuSwC19PbnTSTmMsYXwAafWuMwT7xOVm1/rf7GQsk3 E2u8KlqRPhV1UrYVm7wQ2Rs4Ikw1/gICiwFgPZX2ZOXBl5M1oEQsQn3ugpS4d6Qc 8htEUuI5L9p3okYjmt3tdwSutuvOQ1qYOpqb334MuR41zeRYAZOpA6Wc/QEpnL2M uEePGpfSC7mPrBoFIhgoBVroVh0M+uXjLYsD6gmjiBOqxpc5n0I44MLVW1dkpvPO GJlzSxl0HBVmVlDr+PMcQc487ybas2rboKIKqligVO6JRavISt0hksm+B4WEwhb3 BlA79XRPCuREgUAJviS+SfNgpP3QUA5gIUGFUVi1aW7FJtzYZ7iqrG6EtcqbycBM HoRCwCaIvUMrSGlX9c54hq0b/aG+DpJ4YTmEHwEKtgsMqCAHQts= =U1XQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S--