Re: [HACKERS] open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes:
> > OK, I have applied the following patch that uses Cygwin native symlink()
> > instead of the Win32 junctions.  The reason for this is that Cygwin
> > symlinks work on Win95/98/ME where junction points do not and we have no
> > way to know what system will be running the Cygwin binaries so the
> > safest bet is to use the Cygwin versions.  On Win32 native we only run
> > on systems that support junctions.
> 
> I think this is probably a net loss, because what it will mean is that
> you cannot take a data directory built under a Cygwin postmaster and use
> it under a native postmaster, nor vice versa.  Given the number of other
> ways in which we do not support pre-NT4 Windows systems, what is the
> benefit of allowing this one?

I assume Cygwin supports pre-NT4, and always has, and I see no reason to
change that.  Moving a data directory from Cygwin to native Win32 seems
like a pretty rare usage to diable pre-NT4 on a platform the previously
supported it.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [email protected]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster