Re: [HACKERS] open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore
Reini Urban <[email protected]> Tue, 12 Oct 2004 01:42:34 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.cygwin,gmane.os.cygwin,gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bruce Momjian schrieb: > Tom Lane wrote: >>Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes: >> >>>OK, I have applied the following patch that uses Cygwin native symlink() >>>instead of the Win32 junctions. The reason for this is that Cygwin >>>symlinks work on Win95/98/ME where junction points do not and we have no >>>way to know what system will be running the Cygwin binaries so the >>>safest bet is to use the Cygwin versions. On Win32 native we only run >>>on systems that support junctions. >> >>I think this is probably a net loss, because what it will mean is that >>you cannot take a data directory built under a Cygwin postmaster and use >>it under a native postmaster, nor vice versa. Given the number of other >>ways in which we do not support pre-NT4 Windows systems, what is the >>benefit of allowing this one? > > I assume Cygwin supports pre-NT4, and always has, and I see no reason to > change that. Moving a data directory from Cygwin to native Win32 seems > like a pretty rare usage to diable pre-NT4 on a platform the previously > supported it. ok, thanks. I'll communicate that. It's a new feature, so people will not know what's going on, but they already asked about tablespace. And maybe someone wants to test that on his WinME laptop. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html