Re: Postgres Database Design Issues in Tablespace
"Sehat Rosny" <[email protected]> Mon, 06 Dec 2004 11:49:59 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.cygwin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Thank you for the response. before the posting goes to further discussion. I realize this for cygwin discussion. You are right when running Postgresql need to be in native Windows or Linux. So that's why I am choosing Postgresql 8.0. I already post this issues in diffrent group. that's in pgsql performances. (just for clarification, I am not running it in cygwin environment. It just happens I do not not which group to post. And thought cygwin is for postgresql in windows environment). Thank you, Rosny >From: Reini Urban <[email protected]> >To: SehatRosny <[email protected]> >CC: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [CYGWIN] Postgres Database Design Issues in Tablespace >Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 17:34:30 +0100 > >SehatRosny schrieb: >>Refering to 20 tables which can be partition A. All departments tables >>is put into 20 tables. >> some querying of 20 millions records. >> B. For each department create tablespace. (Which means, if there >> are 7000 departments, there will be 7000 tablespace each contains >> 20 tables). A1. Use A option, >> As tables become huge. partition the tables which hits often >> and has large size file(usually when it bigger than 2-3 GB size) >> into separate tablespace. >>B1. Use B option, >> Creating 7000 TableSpace for Departments >> - One Department has one tablespace >> - Each Department has 20 tables > >>Question : >> 1. Is it B1 the right approach? >> 2. Is progresql will have problems if I have 7000 tablespace? > >why tablespace at all? do some caclulation, buy a large disc and forget >about tablespace. (i.e. symlinks) > >postgresql-cygwin certainly will have problems which such a configuration. >Please use a decent operating system and filesystem for such a crazy idea. > >cygwin is certainly not suited well for such a production database. >consider native windows or any unix instead. > >NTFS is certainly not suited well for > 500 files per dir. >consider a unix filesystem instead. >-- >Reini Urban >http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org