Re: unicode support vs native install
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> Sat, 12 Mar 2005 20:25:04 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.cygwin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
pgman wrote: > Eric J. Schwarzenbach wrote: > > The Running & Installing PostgreSQL On Native Windows FAQ has an item on > > not being able to use unicode > > > > http://pginstaller.projects.postgresql.org/FAQ_windows.html#2.6 > > > > "/Because Postgres relies on the operating system for some string > > related functions, the OS needs to support the same encoding as the one > > that is used as the database encoding. Unfortunately, Windows does not > > support some encodings that are available as server-side encodings for PG." > > > > /My understanding is the 8.0 windows installer prevents istalling utf-8 > > but you can get around it with initdb if you know what your doing. > > Apparently only some things related to utf-8 data will be broken like > > sort ordering. > > / > > /Does this apply to Cygwin installs of PostgreSQL as well? > > Yes, it does. The problem is that we only support UTF8 and Windows is > UTF16. If you don't care about character ordering you can initdb with > locale of C and use Unicode as your encoding. > Uh, this is assuming that Cygwin doesn't add UTF8 to Windows. I don't think it does, but I am not sure. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [email protected] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [email protected]