Re: Bug in Dbd-Pg?

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> PF wrote:
>>
>>
>> Well, it's tested, and doesn't crash.  However, depending on the length
>> param the first or second record will be replaced with binary junk
>> and/or be blank.
>>
>>
>

This time I have tested the patch, and it works well for me (tested
against pg 8.1). The patch is against cvs HEAD from GBorg - is that still
the right location?

Can we use this as the basis to get rid of the length param altogether?
IIRC we now insist on a libpq version that is modern enough to provide
PQgetCopyData() which requires no length param.

cheers

andrew