Re: Bug in Dbd-Pg?

David Fetter <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.postgresql.dbdpg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 08:50:22AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 07:57:37PM -0600, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >  
> >>Jon Jensen wrote:
> >>    
> >>>I seem to recall CPAN has a limit of how many versions they let
> >>>you keep around. Two seems far too low. But in any case, if we
> >>>can't increase the number on CPAN, is there somewhere else we can
> >>>keep them? I can provide public space if it's needed.
> >>>      
> >>Much better would be to put them on pgfoundry.
> >
> >Better still would be to expire them.  We don't need to pretend we can
> >afford to support software after the main line project has stopped
> >doing so.
> 
> I don't see any problem at all in archiving old releases and making
> the archive public. It doesn't make any promise of support at all.
> Have a look at ftp://ftp-archives.postgresql.org/pub/source - it has
> every release of postgres since the flood. And we certainly will not
> be supporting version 6.0 for example ;-)

Heh.  Excellent point :)

> Many businesses move slowly to upgrade.  That might annoy some
> people, but it's often quite sensible from their perspective.
> Constantly pushing people to upgrade is somewhat akin to trying to
> teach a pig to sing ...

I know!  We could put them in the /pub/singing_pig directory :)

Cheers,
D
-- 
David Fetter <[email protected]> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778        AIM: dfetter666
                              Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.