Re: pgsql: Remove support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0
Michael Paquier <[email protected]> Tue, 7 Jan 2020 09:25:57 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.cvs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 03:08:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I updated prairiedog and gaur to use OpenSSL 1.0.1e, but we are > not out of the woods there: >=20 > * prairiedog required 6:46 to run the ssl test [1], compared to 3:24 > in its last run with 0.9.8x. Why so much slower? I have seen the tests being slower depending on the version of OpenSSL pattern, though I think that it came with 1.1.0. I have no bothered digging into that though, but I can notice the difference. -- Michael --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAl4T0BUACgkQnvQgOdby QH28kxAAqQO8SOn71UsnYiCuJScOdYafF/H3eQFl1HJKnpHMWFyyfHlNh+YA6g7/ jIv+oapqlaAIW6YcJjvxJyjK6ovHjVtT8avwbjpmtBsrfiQBycyDCItUjqtBPaX6 lRFtyRm60HGPbnqPyz355d9bLUGsYSHJKkFN+gOGHmcQwD26Jsufzv851J9YlUw6 AI7o26WRz6PvMnS5HycIF+aQGFwRbtLKUZcymSV+wuM4ZL2dRCoyJJf0D02/TQ0Y wkZ+kAh0khzrMLxrLFHUgZJp0oAjHcnP61I4cgQHJEcmzTOlZufj2/lv7UrQb8fj YgUosTKwggdA1hgDzHDxBAForCDy7T9Rpi2AkfH6rMtmIAegf3K+VDDNICX6EVWY If34yB4De83oJMkfhHMpiANn2Lxoj+Du0oCRyHgEGIiLtgtcrOkXT5VNPS/Av0S3 PVJeJSdUlqB5isPOmmj7kT+cmRQgJsnP28ZvTbLcDLyLygEZMjSdCf0KYxyPRduJ z5Gnp9XsutmguwndgmWQPszUsW4THaybaoUuisc6QZ0i0PZCn3V/DMjG1sgFXQ5h idBOSvJaZsrpiJnI8amRcNfaOkEFGdh/b3CFnzqaEgfOpf2IFDLT3OgYDAw8Zo8d C3B9HAq42PyqU+yFBP52rXxwyhPk2nu7zR/GGGbVpCUxltPXh3o= =aOvV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU--