Re: pgsql: Remove support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0

Michael Paquier <[email protected]> Tue, 7 Jan 2020 09:25:57 +0900
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.cvs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 03:08:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I updated prairiedog and gaur to use OpenSSL 1.0.1e, but we are
> not out of the woods there:
>=20
> * prairiedog required 6:46 to run the ssl test [1], compared to 3:24
> in its last run with 0.9.8x.  Why so much slower?

I have seen the tests being slower depending on the version of OpenSSL
pattern, though I think that it came with 1.1.0.  I have no bothered
digging into that though, but I can notice the difference.
--
Michael

--Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=aOvV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU--