Re: Is it typo of connection_name?
Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:39:27AM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: > The "connection_name" parameter's explanation is not in Parameters > section. > Instead of it, "connection_object" parameter is in Parameters section. Its > explanation seems about "connection_name". > Is it typo about "connection_name" in Synopsis section, or > "connection_object" in Parameters section? Good catch. If you look at the code (ecpg.trailer), connection_object refers to the name of the parameter, while connection_name refers to "AS connection_object" as a whole. So it seems to me that the intention is to use connection_object in the synopsis of the docs. Any thoughts from others? -- Michael
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAl2BjRoACgkQnvQgOdby QH1sFw//S0/oLysSeIWcTh1F0Jfxr+l2nvH1mDCFABvbSO+E75F8AjttVvsYLPhF Uis+OjfwTvrn6mT8ffX6hcmNRQhXQqCoxswl1Bl0pzCEq4aao5/e14Vsv7oyUuRd lMp28PN7VbB0BM+ggvH/9yZuIvRLg37p/Nzqiq7OYoUj2dOOcdEfmc3G//LxndK0 S0V051UVIgV+DVyjDcq9tuKB5ll7gjDDPttO44lYXcthDTJqYwSAjuxlOp+A1KIP WwBFKsO2co9Mg1oIUrnwBSGZVR43MbT+gJEO+HUJgiH5bB4EkUf6eFZUruIXaHHq ENutSEMpLIdEoawVA+WnLbYaMG6yuv/m8KU1bjOml3QuV5HiehSCuCMyZE5wDdSi DuIem9GCqj2g3tESDd+45bkiXd6FVczvAoqVZzXHvQgFi3E70UhH3Rw26mTm2ezw Finsd8vUaIpLor6Kumb/W91FJFOg2hyWukGdXltxlBuWcMXUmoAy8XAfgTkeVmT3 F4jYmM0gT9Htbu7jPC+qXmCle8s4PJS+mwfRnVXAIIBqUoRbL2tpKNY68VasBtD5 2+n7gTrVyMkPK+n1to/XbnMKaSAuGAnK7yHDdB6c+JDcMvfa0Ypj/b4RIgEBU1Fd zCZa3y1eT3YupkLzbiNZKpZsJElKipWFJrf8MumGlbr4D1v16K8= =ll+I -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----