Re: Is it typo of connection_name?
Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:49:14AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Good catch. If you look at the code (ecpg.trailer), connection_object > refers to the name of the parameter, while connection_name refers to > "AS connection_object" as a whole. So it seems to me that the > intention is to use connection_object in the synopsis of the docs. > Any thoughts from others? Actually, looking around we use connection_name for other commands like EXEC SQL or DISCONNECT, so renaming connection_object to connection_name makes the documentation more consistent. And done. -- Michael
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAl2DAiEACgkQnvQgOdby QH0r4xAAjsXmpf/QiNmQDI7Hzuf6l1oyee7+Bw4yO6NaumvEOTXQOH6paekzkvDP stfjL2ZAHbsRr4mtiQhDH2rnCayBFH7nJQkCylaocQb+XYUP+P0cXehosc1A6iwt 08cIc1BbeimMWWNad59m1mw3CLkHkvSkP7WcDhu3bI+X8ee21/yHhKBwZiiI7Axf KED4XSWCZUbL9urD9yLqajoh1H/hvq2mVWZ1SnpEVhG9onhgF6mY72+51c66M9nB pPU+5TYmulfVCWH5usqKqx4qnEfXjC14G2HbtzwUIlksPA8hg5lTaf0rMDVjuBma JG1HM8nv25Vgh+75VeSITD4+nlapMr9Y7D1VtxQ2nuJdH4yAwGczydvf+nAUit/Q Pz8AEyGJXHBYKuRUyAd5YAflzhDFa6TLvybc5khPbB21qTMfl+WtboLKTn3AtUZ3 /Ny5j9UrWdgixBKEM8pr+waax5S5R1Si9s9bJxD6FHi1egpYnW01Zvk080fcrokM /xLKZ/Fo6wcgK30fJmoAtHtq2y46EqM+BDSahlK3+6b0Qwkbh7dkOLYQSXCMlSnk 59DsgCm2X9FC3jEu/WXE6olcrRtuQxYSzQ3Jq+YoMc4+wmUWCO9J1DgN96tFDWxr 62q3ZmYAzlZ0rt8xz4XeYy2CRAyKBC+ao5eaU9r28Wy2p+keZXk= =cljJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----