Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced
Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> Thu, 7 Nov 2019 19:55:22 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On 7 Nov 2019, at 16:03, Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> wrote: > because we have not explained what a "virgin database" is. I think this is the key observation. > We could say "empty", which seems better suited than both "virgin" and > "pristine" anyway. empty is a lot better, but still isn't conveying the state of the database without there being room for interpretation. (My grasp of the english language isn't enough to suggest a better alternative however). cheers ./daniel