Re: Mark a reloption as indexterm
Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:57:32PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Are you suggesting that it should show "index storage parameters" and > "table storage parameters"? I'm not sure about that myself ... > particularly considering that certain parameters might apply to some > index AMs and not others. Yes, that's exactly what I was suggesting: putting all the index-related parameters into an index bucket, without caring about the AM involved. -- Michael
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAlywD4AACgkQnvQgOdby QH1NdxAAo26E1qLzZtOgxHAnMuMClKiYJvlhXbBi/4HrFe8rP8opzEmYxrcwFp6H M6j5oJaYTj/BfztNX+Jq3y/1F5VtJ2nGnMuIF0llkmce0Wm6zpxGJuDbvQMW4YFt rQaVRvQsETEeK0ir6gXUCqgqqfub1dKT3fgGjuBHs9R4XqXGvVOmoZ+hLPuskD9/ KjEsRZJrfkdHWNNoQ5DR7vKVu4Pjs7B41wnZFRanyBVqfnvFW3YjFvRlCW+hdscA qmkv8HFu0k3hKbC3NY1SM8pulX5Wfzn263ktk3GWd9Aqn9IQYQFOpEzrKEo1hXdG 1jcebfRyj+Lxc1K1S7fydGjYj3q54WY1au14t5FoVkCqKBh7f17HFTybRdR4pEv2 qmGQ/LGp/2DuucsVUzV778ZXXexToKd+pajNTmMaEeeeHhbEVeyFqENWGp4JhJiw QEV1XJreD2tugtWGsS8B+EOxfW69Ly0hzyhTN+LnyJ2wSo3LWsTH8n8tCGEpsN5v 2dXjcaenUzYW8/xCs4evxBpoGrD+X2lqI4L51ISTmaRiZaTBRxkTHWgkydTpOoEh 5EvqfQinixNgIWgAzY0Fr66xzUjxyyg/mUq6xqFPvCedS5dzfkO8z3iAeY7jrpf/ 1gdh6QumZ3tGagzMsNsJjuRBVC0VbwaYXbvaH+YTU/iYBK371T0= =EtxF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----