Re: Mark a reloption as indexterm

Michael Paquier <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Apr 2019 12:26:10 +0900

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.documentation
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 12:14:01AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> So I used <secondary> tag again for the above style if both reloption
> and guc with the same parameter name exist. Attached is the updated
> version of the patch. This patch also marks index-reloption as indexterm.
> 
> Barring any objections, I will commit this patch.

Thanks Fujii-san.  This looks fine to me.
--
Michael

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=4moc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.