Re: some grammar fixes for docs
Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 05:11:37PM +0300, Liudmila Mantrova wrote: > I have noticed imperfect grammar in a couple of sgml files, please consider > a small patch (attached). Thanks, Liudmila for caring about such matters. > <para> > - Transaction which last more than <replaceable>limit</replaceable> milliseconds > + Transactions that last more than <replaceable>limit</replaceable> milliseconds > are counted and reported separately, as <firstterm>late</firstterm>. > </para> I don't see much of a difference between "which" or "that" in this context, and you are right about the plural for "Transactions". Any native English speaker around or anybody with an extra opinion? > <para> > Of the two operator classes for type <type>point</type>, > <literal>quad_point_ops</literal> is the default. <literal>kd_point_ops</literal> > - supports the same operators but uses a different index data structure which > + supports the same operators but uses a different index data structure that > may offer better performance in some applications. > </para> Same here. > @@ -447,9 +447,9 @@ typedef struct spgChooseOut > type that was to be inserted into the index. > <structfield>leafDatum</structfield> is a value of > <structname>spgConfigOut</structname>.<structfield>leafType</structfield> > - type which is initially an result of method > + type, which is initially a result of method I actually would not add a comma here, as the follow-up expression gives more details about the leaf type previously mentioned. > <function>compress</function> applied to <structfield>datum</structfield> > - when method <function>compress</function> is provided, or same value as > + when method <function>compress</function> is provided, or the same value as I would do what you suggest here. > Converts the data item into a format suitable for physical storage in > a leaf tuple of index page. It accepts > <structname>spgConfigIn</structname>.<structfield>attType</structfield> > - value and return > + value and returns This one is right. Good catch. -- Michael
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAlzd8yUACgkQnvQgOdby QH3osxAAnsqmQoXhqSCLN46NGxIG71OTM+MubyzRwP5AxUaRE8kQbjChJeZ/0+fc AO7NW2ldvVcBUTNaayUnT6Ue8Zk39nWFJqKswSid1CrzlNqmZAOjA8RDu1dNWiKc WmgQQG39W3XGmHGIEDNrQmxlsnSF2lnV9djoDcCYJf1uL/U9nkKLg097na66UAhw iaBXgQqmsq36M1RdFgMF+DhT7vIfUcChdXapEMHPK16Yuw59eAoR1AvjkmV/9xTq X8Oh8UIBxF5nFxuvGVgce0UmK7Xvq/VhdaLEDTuZ5Yg5uzJAvqRrqRClSQCOxz8h YyhpBlaNeQi7tlaK0IUpMewzVZhlxhsOwWM5BCt1kwgdD6k9PW4R9WNtosMidl/9 efhxwtIebIzZOQpzKD9RGsxzMHoB47Tl+ACPmAYzupyfXjsg8/FJ/EPnQQ/NciQ5 5yLwn2rvCqTSXte1k7kJaF3tdr0KMywSSqbkHaF7FRncV6P450tsMFqWABsnBjbO CRUFFIcag63783QNwPGYeQf6MR+5JQOjbL3yAUgYyVXIWQQU7uW02OqaSHz9n2WF YIWoux9KeGzoy7ycmLPGob7I09atg04GrUYWroB35q3kQWOyL+TBkmZHTJg6t+wp PrpNoHOG/Vuejerkib92tx7Huu5FVa92z+qazM1SrUDOgEXfmrs= =9cZH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----