Re: SPITupleTable members missing in docs
Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 04:40:51PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > Yeah, that’s clearly an alternative. If we go down this route, then perhaps > the docs should be swept for other instances (if any) and handle them all to > keep things consistent? (and yes, I volunteer if we want to opt for that.) FWIW, we still need a proper description of these fields in the docs, so listing them in spi.sgml has the advantage to improve the grepping coverage of which area needs to be patched. This structure not updated actually shows that this argument can be wrong as well ;p -- Michael
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEG72nH6vTowiyblFKnvQgOdbyQH0FAl0G9pUACgkQnvQgOdby QH3VfQ//e0hs1Fb3AywJ/IIRiBkHE42CUi8j6qWsnj7W5aZe4RAStuOnFoUROpe9 7hDQzfdEhgg/nKitepxTZ/cXOPFDb1uypsbAok/vB/TwD7aKIYddjYyHGEbqS17b WgthxFbPiyjRuZzJOrpSJe25KlFfnf+1LCYZpfsOG8LWy6hIHkUCj2WytJgRsKTd IERa72rQh84pD3/GW/QG42nxvngnTuo2Hb1CmPPvaHXxH4V2KBbAFnLEtrChxP3G mT+n6kc2r6U1qOEv/gW9YhvyD4WQ4HCyqN43T+Zmpmr2LfwzFBgA1+ikhZWwx7CN MDH7V05jJ2DwpykYVjqHVbJ4eFS2EWjCRR2TGlXZSDqs7qpE9Tfod9ToQKM8IUXU QSnPmVuhcJsYY4T2mKXRQTjuxFU52cO37uU4BXa1DKXNch+YEV6KFNcdcjfvJcgK akZsSsaHFcrPFflzayjO3eryxqX9wQaGLC55FWmD42pIeXJ5PSDhTk5+K20+o7LA 247eNZ8HAsjztd2ohTbPRKCmbJuc0SUpF58B086IkPb5KvPDNTMz47r0cXFv0pmx Qbf+cxN87AE6O3oReIISxe+bwzkiDu+i2rvs9MfqPgf2Pwy3mdsegWtKvNkgeBN/ Ri98EyxMXJ0ETyomJI5SUIWvH/iVax3YwW1FW3zY+fQurT9nyhU= =v2V3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----