Re: weird libpq GSSAPI comment
Robbie Harwood <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stephen Frost <[email protected]> writes: >> Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> writes: > > How about something like this? > > * If GSSAPI Encryption is enabled, then call pg_GSS_have_cred_cache() > * which will return true if we can acquire credentials (and give us a > * handle to use in conn->gcred), and then send a packet to the server > * asking for GSSAPI Encryption (and skip past SSL negotiation and > * regular startup below). This looks correct to me (and uses plenty of parentheticals, so it feels in keeping with something I'd write) :) Thanks, --Robbie
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 832 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEA5qc6hnelQjDaHWqJTL5F2qVpEIFAl4TpNoACgkQJTL5F2qV pEIh+Q/+PfsvWtEsk/dCCycTRCRfvmQJqB5VpQMlR47ItqpWnnayM0Ez6nMAlcIc 5cZ25iODFfWbH09984GvItk3LSPaEKL0TmDnQPRuj2kD/BX9ASIERt1YVDz0BMEO Wf+osjrIRiftW3ExYWHgyTNYM7E05wAexbAt/yF30r/EKaufzxDc8XMfItJn623g 0LCZuZ45N17Ezt5TycEBWnMvlX/dhSbuUGU/AlsWq56+1gbIlMrsSjw80qzGL6TP MIM5jhaGz2yX2vU5ZexvPFsIiGqv1JK5vVXa9gCBQdj3so1f+Is5ow/ltBN7PJAf 90mccsUujY8dAiIczSA/xgdHRLorHT4dRK75tHZ7M4Pfbcfvyax9AkK3XaAFV4VD Xkud472TzGpFxEllOoAPQjgkQhINr24pUVVtY2t1OcsyC+wQ3DaEgWhA9aAyG5Ee rL2zLnFwaxEz8NnSfQLGG9Mi8h+/JM28FuEAIwPIEQIm5Kuy7SiiPUEcwxttUJzU eNnRLBaoQIXWBhXJtgb5H15JMJwrciqb3zZxnrFqvnTdv9ElEtTALI+3reeoGZ3E c69D7J84+xiXsHPEkW6NFQrIjhrLOYEaJCc9YjPu1Ukh9j8h7QEq4CkpSnFgSpDD U85YXOYDjkWxgiD4vvOlzY2l6ivwW9IeavqMeQGErZhHiBdIsgg= =l4qP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----