Re: parallel vacuum options/syntax

Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.general
Message-ID <CA+fd4k6zVJa6t_3m2cX9+=KEaRHrx2wE0_LVtbK4TfU8AKodkQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 15:31, Amit Kapila <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 11:31 AM Masahiko Sawada
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 15:27, Masahiko Sawada
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I just felt it's not intuitive that specifying parallel degree to 0
> > > means to disable parallel vacuum. But since majority of hackers seem
> > > to agree with this syntax I'm not going to insist on that any further.
> > >
> >
> > Okay I'm going to go with enabling parallel vacuum by default and
> > disabling it by specifying PARALLEL 0.
> >
>
> Sounds fine to me.  However, I have already started updating the patch
> for that.  I shall post the new version today or tomorrow.  Is that
> fine with you?

Yes, that's fine. Thanks.

Regards,

-- 
Masahiko Sawada            http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.