Re: [HACKERS] WITH RECURSIVE patch V0.1

Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Zoltan Boszormenyi <[email protected]> wrote:
>   
>> Can we get the rows in tree order, please? I.e. something like this:
>>     
>
> Is ordering by tree order defined in the standard when no explicit
> order is given?  If not, it probably returns them in the order they
> are pulled up, which might be the fastest way

+1 for the fastest way, which I expect to often be "find all level 1 
matches", "find all level 2 matches", ... If ORDER BY is important, it 
should be specified (although it may be difficult or impossible to 
properly represent ORDER BY for a tree? not sure?) I think most uses of 
recursive require extra client side code to deal with anyways, so only 
relative order is important (order within a particular branch).

There are things I'd like to use this for right now. Currently I use 
plpgsql procedures to implement my own recursion. :-)

Cheers,
mark

-- 
Mark Mielke <[email protected]>