Re: GIN improvements
Teodor Sigaev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> How about having a constant sized "fastupdate" buffer, of say 100 rows > or a fixed number of pages, and when that becomes full, the next > inserter will have to pay the price of updating the index and flushing I'm not sure that is acceptable because flushing pending list may take several seconds in unpredictable moment. > the buffer. To keep that overhead out of the main codepath, we could > make autovacuum to flush the buffers periodically. Do you mean that GIN sends a "smoke signal" to the autovacuum launcher process to ask about vacuum? -- Teodor Sigaev E-mail: [email protected] WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/ -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches