Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency info in DETAIL

Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.patches
Message-ID <[email protected]>
There was some discussion a few days ago about making dependency.c emit
dependency reports in the same style that pg_shdepend.c does, viz
a lot of DETAIL lines on a single message instead of separate NOTICE
messages.  Attached is a tentative patch that does that.  See the
regression-test diffs for samples of what the output looks like.

I'm not entirely sure whether I like the results better than what
we have.  Opinions anyone?  There are some cases where it seems
clearly better, eg the sequence.out changes, but in a lot of others
it doesn't seem much better.

One particular case of interest is in truncate.out, where the
table-at-a-time implementation of DROP TABLE is clearly exposed
by the fact that you get multiple NOTICEs.  I wonder if it would
be worth refactoring the code so that a multiple-object DROP is
implemented via performMultipleDeletions().  This would have more
than just cosmetic advantages: it would no longer matter what
order you listed the tables in.  But the refactoring required looks
bigger and more tedious than I want to tackle right now.

I also want to note that we've historically had the code report
auto-cascade drops as DEBUG2 messages.  I tried to merge those reports
into the main one but it was a complete mess :-( because the client and
server-log messages might have different numbers of entries depending on
their log-level settings.  Almost the first case I tried favored me with
	NOTICE: drop cascades to 0 other object(s)
	DETAIL:
reported to the client (with the server log of course saying something
different).  So I gave up and left that behavior separate.

Comments?  Should we do this, or leave things alone?

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
(unnamed) (application/octet-stream, 4.6 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.