Re: Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency info in DETAIL
Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Alex Hunsaker escribió: > Ok I'm obviously missing something important... Why not Just make the > various Remove* functions take a list? > > I'm not proposing this patch for actual submission, more of a would this work? > If I'm not missing something glaring obvious Ill go ahead and make the > rest of the Remove things behave the same way I don't think there's anything wrong with that in principle. However, does your patch actually work? The changes in expected/ is unexpected, I think. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches