Re: variadic function support
Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]> writes: > >> This proposal strikes me as half-baked. Either we need proper and full >> support for variadic functions, or we don't, but I don't think we need >> syntactic sugar like the above (or maybe in this case it's really >> syntactic saccharine). >> > > What would you consider "proper and full support"? > > > I don't know. But this doesn't feel like it. I'm not even sure it's possible to so in any sane way alongside overloading. cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches