Re: [UPDATED] A GUC variable to replace PGBE_ACTIVITY_SIZE
Tom Lane <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Heikki Linnakangas" <[email protected]> writes: > Another simple optimization occurred to me while looking at this: we > should skip the memcpy/strcpy altogether if the BackendActivity slot is > not in use. That seems like a good bet, you usually don't try to max out > max_connections. Huh? How could we be assigning to a slot that is not in use? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches