Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
Stephen Frost <[email protected]> Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:56:02 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Simon, * Simon Riggs ([email protected]) wrote: > > I hadn't realized that Simon was using "pre-schema" and "post-schema" > > to name the first and third parts. I'd agree that this is confusing > > nomenclature: it looks like it's trying to say that the data is the > > schema, and the schema is not! How about "pre-data and "post-data"? > > OK by me. Any other takers? Having the command-line options be "--schema-pre-data" and "--schema-post-data" is fine with me. Leaving them the way they are is also fine by me. It's the documentation (back to pg_dump.sgml, ~774/~797) that starts talking about Pre-Schema and Post-Schema. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkiEeVIACgkQrzgMPqB3kihVtACfW0BGGt4IdGgJnToq9guNNiW8 R5YAn2P9zgHorVISit3FE0J5Vj7yuDKb =dKEa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----