Re: hash index improving v3

Zdenek Kotala <[email protected]> writes:
> I performed code review and see my comments.

Thanks for the comments.  I've incorporated all of these into an updated
patch that I'm preparing, except for

>      Why not define new datatype for example HashKey instead of uint32?

This seems like a good idea, but I think we should do it as a separate,
cosmetic-cleanup patch.  It'll touch a lot of parts of access/hash/ that
the current patch doesn't need to change, and thus complicate reviewing.

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches