Re: [HACKERS] Infrastructure changes for recovery
Tom Lane <[email protected]> Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:18:16 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Simon Riggs <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 13:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Hmm, I dunno, it seems like that might be a bad choice. Are you sure >> it's not cleaner to just use the regular checkpoint code? > When I tried to write it, it just looked to my eyes like every single > line had a caveat which looked ugly and multiplied the testing. You're > the code dude, always happy to structure things as you suggest. If > you're sure, that is. No, was just wondering if the other way would be better. If you're sure not, that's fine. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches