Re: hash index improving v3
Tom Lane <[email protected]> Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:16:34 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Simon Riggs <[email protected]> writes: > maintenance_work_mem is already used for 3 separate operations that bear > little resemblance to each other. If it's appropriate for all of those > then its appropriate for this usage also. No, it isn't. The fundamental point here is that this isn't a memory allocation parameter; it's a switchover threshold between two different behaviors. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches