Re: Win32 testing needed
Tom Lane <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.win32 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andreas Pflug <[email protected]> writes: > We could have *two* handles open to the syslogger file, but that's > probably more fragile. Making the current write_syslogger_file static > and providing another function that converts in a local buffer and > calles write_syslogger_file seems best. Agreed (although actually I was thinking of preserving write_syslogger_file as the externally visible name and renaming the existing function to a static "write_syslogger_file_binary" or some such --- fewer files to touch that way). Do you have time to write and check this today? I could write it but am not in a good position to test it. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [email protected] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly