Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid

Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.patches,gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.win32
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"Dave Page" <[email protected]> writes:
>> ISTM we should not ever queue any event for signal 0.

> That was my original intention, however Magnus thought it best just to
> let it be queued and subsequently ignored by the backend - thinking
> about it 15 minutes later I can't for the life of me think why that's
> any better...

Are there any error cases that we would miss detecting if it didn't go
that far?

			regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.