Re: [PATCHES] psql \! WIN32 cleanup

Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.win32,gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.patches
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes:
> > The attached applied patch tests for COMSPEC in the right place and
> > supplies a reasonable shell default on Win32.
> 
> > + #define DEFAULT_SHELL "c:/windows/system32/cmd.exe"
> 
> Is it really a good idea to assume that the Windows installation is on
> drive C: ?
> 
> (This is an honest question, not a rhetorical one.  I dunno whether
> inserting the C: is better than leaving it off.  I can think of cases
> where either way will break, but I'm unsure what's most likely in
> practice.)

Not sure.  Should we just do "/windows/system32/cmd.exe" and leave off
the C:?  The previous default was "/bin/sh" and that certainly will not
work on Win32.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [email protected]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
      joining column's datatypes do not match
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.