Re: scalability issues on win32

"Dave Page" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.win32,gmane.comp.db.postgresql.performance
Message-ID <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E43072FA@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: 23 November 2004 15:06
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Merlin Moncure; [email protected]; 
> PostgreSQL Win32 port list
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] scalability issues on win32
> 
> The general opinion of server users is that you need 2-4 more 
> Win32 servers to do the same work as one Unix-like server.  
> That and the difficulty of automated administration and 
> security problems is what is preventing Win32 from making 
> greater inroads into the server marketplace.
> 
> Of course these are just generalizations.

I'd rather avoid an OS advocacy war here, but if I'm honest, with group
policy and other tools such as SUS, I find that my Windows servers are
actually easier to administer than the Linux ones (I have about a 50-50
mix at work). Perhaps that's because I favour Slackware though?

As for the 2-4 servers quote, I find that a little on the high side. I
agree that generally you might expect a little more performance from an
equivalent Linux system on the same hardware, but in my practical
experience the difference is far less than you suggest.

Regards, Dave.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.