Re: UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32
Tom Lane <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.win32 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Magnus Hagander" <[email protected]> writes: > We know it's broken and won't be fixed for 8.0. > If we just #ifndef WIN32 the definitions in utils/mb/encnames.c it won't > be possible to select that encoding, right? Will that have any other > unwanted effects (such as breaking client encodings)? If not, I suggest > this is done. I believe the subscripts in those arrays have to match the encoding enum type, so you can't just ifdef out individual entries. > (Or perhaps something can be done in pg_valid_server_encoding?) Making the valid_server_encoding function reject it might work. Tatsuo-san would know for sure. Should we also reject it as a client encoding, or does that work OK? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [email protected])