Re: UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32
Tatsuo Ishii <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.win32 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sorry, but I don't subscribe to pgsql-hackers-win32 list. What's the problem here? -- Tatsuo Ishii > "Magnus Hagander" <[email protected]> writes: > > We know it's broken and won't be fixed for 8.0. > > > If we just #ifndef WIN32 the definitions in utils/mb/encnames.c it won't > > be possible to select that encoding, right? Will that have any other > > unwanted effects (such as breaking client encodings)? If not, I suggest > > this is done. > > I believe the subscripts in those arrays have to match the encoding > enum type, so you can't just ifdef out individual entries. > > > (Or perhaps something can be done in pg_valid_server_encoding?) > > Making the valid_server_encoding function reject it might work. > Tatsuo-san would know for sure. > > Should we also reject it as a client encoding, or does that work OK? > > regards, tom lane > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend