Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.win32 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes: > > What about the *.txt extension? Do we want that or remove it? I would > > prefer its removal. > > I agreed with the point about making those files easily editable. > I'm not dead set on it, but I don't see what we gain by not having > the .txt there --- we still have to document a different file name > and different location than is the case on Unix. My feeling is that the *.txt is actually misleading because people will think of it as a file full of freeform text (paragraphs) and not a configuration file. Does anyone know of a configuration file that uses *.txt? I don't. Perhaps there is another extension that is good for Win32 but i don't think *.txt is it. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [email protected] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [email protected]