Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.win32 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tom Lane wrote: >"T.J." <[email protected]> writes: > > >>Has anyone else tested out the use of client certs with the new win >>code? Rebuilt the latest from scratch and I started getting SSL SYSCALL, >>so I went into fe-secure.c, and commented out line 842 (again), and now >>it works (again). Any ideas why commenting that line is such a >>penicillin? Or rather, why that if statement is causing such problems. >> >> > >Doh --- isn't fstat's st_ino a meaningless value on Windows? > > Pretty much, yes. See http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vclib/html/_crt__fstat.2c_._fstati64.asp and http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vclib/html/_crt__stat.2c_._wstat.2c_._stati64.2c_._wstati64.asp The latter states: "The inode, and therefore *st_ino*, has no meaning in the FAT, HPFS, or NTFS file systems." The fstat page doesn't even refer to it at all. cheers andrew ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster